Several questions are often asked when determining the success of a school.
One of the questions that is asked is how many students graduated on time. “On time” is the issue that forces most kids out of school. And if the fundamental purpose of education is to assure students are prepared for the future, whether they do it on time, a month later or two months earlier should be irrelevant.
Consider this: A student fails second grade. Since that student’s chances of graduating on time are diminished, should he/she go home and forget third grade and beyond? Of course that doesn’t happen but it does happen in ninth grade on a regular basis. That is the number one reason for drop outs.
Also consider the reality that kids don’t get their teeth at the same time, they don’t start talking at the same time, they don’t start walking at the same time, they don’t recognize colors at the same time, but when they get into first grade they must be at the same time, at the same place in the text book, learning the same way, scoring the same on an artificial test and on and on.
2. The second question often asked is "How many are proficient?" Again proficient is based on everyone learning at the same rate. If you are “proficient” 3 months later it doesn’t count as being proficient.
Everything has a deadline. What if standards were guidelines for success rather than deadlines for failure. What if we realized kids learn in different ways and at different rates? And what if kids demonstrated learning for their assessment. Rather than stating the scientific method, they demonstrated it through a science project for their assessment.
What is a good school and what is a bad school? Under the current system, no one knows. And a test score says nothing!