Accountability with Honor
( and yes, we use a small reading test)
Accountability is the main reason the testing fiasco began in the first place and continues today. However, the reality is the current process leads to a false
accountability. Instead, I present true
accountability. The question is not how
many students in your school are proficient on a test. The question becomes how many students make
dramatic gains toward demonstrated proficiency while under your watch and
compared with how they have done in the past.
Is the current teacher really responsible for the success or failure of
students past performance? I think not!
Yes the test is a convenient way to determine a score. But other assessments can better give
information to determine proficiency success.
When students are involved in debate contests, are there not ways to
judge them? When performers appear on
THE VOICE, is there not a way to judge them?
When students are involved in a project that uses a variety of
mathematical and scientific skills such as science fairs is there not a way to
judge them? When school bands have a competition, is there not a way to judge them? As students present a
variety of small projects throughout the year is there not a way to judge
them? When students give a speech, is
there not a way to judge them? Of all forms of assessment, the test is the
least able to determine achievement
Schools
labeled as failed are based
on unconfirmed generalities primarily using a singular test that not only
changes with frequency but leads to inconsistency based on the students ability
to take a test. The solution to a successful school under the current system is, in part, determined by
the schools ability to play the education game.
So let the games begin.
We are familiar
with the well publicized scandals of recent years. This, however, is only the tip of the
iceberg. The game of subtly keeping low scoring kids out of school is tough one
to catch. A simple trick is having a
lottery where only those kids with readily available support systems
apply. Those in crises or devastated by
the economic caste system, or
whose parents work 2 or 3 jobs would miss the boat. And
the school that wins can give a sigh of relief as they don’t have to serve
those kids.
A popular trend
when “No Child Left Behind” became law was to force low scoring kids out of
school just before the test. Easy enough
to do. And there is the always popular suspending
kids for the day of the test or even better yet, give them a “time out”. That way the absence didn’t show on their
record. The battle for the best scoring
kids has been going on for years and it continues. Do charter, choice or private schools all
take kids with special needs? And that also goes for troubled and
low scoring kids. There are a multitude
of games that I don’t even know about, but they are there. They are there because education is a game
about winning, not learning.
Regardless of the games, in order to understand and adapt the current system of education, we must understand natural differences in children. When we have a range of skills and abilities
from the severest of the cognative disabled children across the board to those book
learned students who are good test takers, this wide range will never be at the
same place at the same time on their academic pathway to success. It is
not human nature for all to be the same unless we want to develop robots or
throw out all that are slower.
And then we have kids who have roadblocks put in the
way of learning. They are most often the victims. Clearly when we look at all students, it is
easy to understand the reality that they blossom beautifully at different
rates. Adding to the normal range of
skills we add real obstacles that slow learning. According to Paul Tough, childhood stress
literally slows the brain. Together with
malnutrition, chronic illness and a wide range of obstacles, some kids (we
don’t know which ones) no matter how intelligent will be slow to achieve. And then we add too low expectations that
also slow the learning process and too high expectation that push kids out of
school, the reality is that with one single standard the two problems mentioned
will exist forever. Expectations must be
individual. Remember
raising the bar? This is designed to
keep kids out of school. They think it
is cheaper but don´t ever believe that sustaining a prison system is cheap.
Remember some of
the obstacles that get in the way of learning?
Two that simply do not get in the way of learning is income or poverty
by itself and race. These two issues
have nothing to do with the lack of intelligence and that should be made
clear. Of course many kids in poverty
are also afflicted by the afore mentioned obstacles. However, poverty families without those
obstacles are fully able to function well.
Thus when someone says “my students are all poverty stricken children of
color and they all go to college, the question must arise, which poor children
of color are you serving? We must abandon
the racist belief that all poor black children are the same, blossom at the
same time in the same way, are struggling and it is the school that saves
them. It lacks ethics for the school to
take full credit for what the parents do.
Often said is “my students all come from single parent families and they
are doing well”. There are many great
single parents and they should not be disrespected.
Schools have
been labeled as failed schools and closed or lose money under the premise that
their students are ill-served and would do better served in a more successful
school that has better teachers and a stronger curriculum. Instead, resources are cut, the curriculum is
narrowed to avoid the strengths of many students and students that need us the
most are gathered, by elimination into a few schools, hearded like cattle, just
to be seen as stupid and their schools called failed, no matter the gains that
they make or how intelligent they really are.
Has the current
process of test based assessment consistently closed schools that are seeing
real progress with a high percentage of students? This test “sees” a student for a couple of hours on a
single day where the teachers see the student every day of the school
year. Which do you think better
understands the child?
To ensure kids
really learn on an even playing field and schools and teachers are held
accountable we now explore how to transform the current shattered system of
education into one that serves all children well.
Start with simple pre and post-tests given one on one for the variety of skills needed for
reading. Short and simple tests are valuable as we are simply looking for a snap shot in time. A test serves no purpose if it doesn’t reach
kids in the way they best respond and certainly if it doesn’t give information
to the classroom teachers in a timely manner.
To assure an even playing field, the data gathered for school assessment
purposes must be only from students who took the pre-test at the beginning of
the year and the post-test at the end of the year. Now, of course, subtract the pre-test scores
from the post-test scores to determine yearly gains. However, it is extremely important not to
compare student scores with other students no matter how similar or
dissimilar. This isn’t a sporting event
where all a child has to lose is a game.
This is education where what a child has to lose is the rest of his
life. Using the seventh grade as an
example, first it must be determined whether or not accurate tests were given
in the past. If not, take the pretest
information and divide by six to determine the average gains in those past years. This will then give you an idea about the
student’s progress.
If, you have a
record of individual tests confirmed by teachers, you can chart actual progress
and also determine if the student had ever reached the levels that your school
is now seeing. For example, if your school observes a child gain one grade level that
had never been seen before, don’t let anyone tell you that your school is a
failure.
Here is an
example of how the school assessment might read:
75% of students
gained one year or more in reading.
15% of students
gained two years or more in reading.
Of the 75% who
gained the full year in reading, 50% were lagging two or three years behind on
the pre-test.
Of the 75% who
gained a full year in reading, 20% were lagging four or more years behind on
the pre-test.
17% of all
students gained less than one year in reading.
Of the 17%, 100%
were lagging more than four years on the pre-test with 80% being chronic
truants.
Clearly
understand that tests are only a snap shot in time. Therefore the teachers must confirm the
scores from their wide range of authentic classroom assessments. If there is a contradiction, consultations
must determine the actual skill level of the student.
This might include the use of a variety of assessment tools. (Just a side note for those who are obsessed
by the possibility of cheating, if the post-test scores were inflated, the next
years teachers would raise holy hell when compared to the new pre-test. And this test is not given by the classroom
teacher.)
Some might have
a concern that one full year gain doesn’t allow students to “catch up” to their
peers. Consider this, first kids blossom
in different ways and at different rates. (Given, of course that they are
human) Crediting author Susan Ohanian for recognizing kids learn like sap from
a maple tree, one drip at a time.
Secondly, in the wealthier suburbs, where most students are on level, a
“successful” school is expected to see increases of one year in reading, why
would it be different in urban schools.
Of course we want students who are behind to gain more, that’s what students do when we trade winning for learning.
However, if schools bring a high percentage of students up by one level
and in previous years those same students averaged .33 of a grade level gain,
it is highly probable that the light went off and the student’s level would
continue to grow. Remember, to bring
students up to level, they must learn faster than the better students. This can be done, but one drip at a time.
The test is only
a snap shot in time. When the test is taken out of the realm of
politics and a wide range of assessments are used to educate the student, then,
and only then, will assessment have value.
The question of
accountability is extremely important.
No one wants an educator in their school who is doing damage to
kids. And, yes, we can use a simple test
score as an indicator. However, by
itself, the test does not show the value of a teacher or a school. There are way too many variables such as
previous teachers, environmental causes, physical health, mental health as well
as natural differences in all human beings.
However, if you couple slow progress by many students in a particular class,
with the test, there would be reason to be concerned. This concern would lead
to a full assessment to determine if the teacher is using the correct methods
as well as creating the right atmosphere for learning. To get
rid of teachers or close schools utilizing artificial means is just a power
game with a political agenda. Simply by
switching the child’s school accomplishes nothing. But to make changes based on an even playing
field and valid facts is essential.
To take politics
out of the teacher and school assessment we must also take politics out of
teacher observations. School
administrators have their hands full managing a school and lack sufficient time
to fully assess a teacher. Consider
using retired teachers to be assigned to these duties. Rarely is it
that a retired teacher would tolerate an unsatisfactory teacher in the
classroom. The costs would be
significantly less than hiring more administrators and they would have more
time in the classrooms. In addition they
would be more suited to understanding the needs of the teacher and available to
help. And they certainly would have no
hesitation to recommend that administers “pull the plug” if the teacher was
unsuccessful.
Seek out information with quality assessment in the
classroom, in everyday lessons not on one single day of high pressure tests. And taking off the pressure allows room for the unquantifiable. The path to demonstrated proficiencies will easily include those skills that can't be quantified. Build these into every lesson!
A child is more
than a test score. Currently we push
kids out of school for blossoming different than the norm. In the process we lose so many brilliant
students. How do we know who will become
the next Dr. Temple Grandon, or Dr. Ben Carson or the next
Albert Einstein, all who experienced difficulty with the current school
process? How do we know when genius will unfold if we lose kids to the street
before they blossom?
Check out my new book:
Check out my new book:
Sound and sensible. The "retired teachers" would need to have been successful teachers, and they would need training as well in a coherent, but simple framework of evaluation.
ReplyDeleteAgree, I worked with several agencies that did just that. And the teachers were good
ReplyDeleteWhen I taught undergrad math, I told my students that tests were simply a means of communication between student and teacher designed to guide the instruction process, that it was a matter of some inconvenience that third parties had taken it on themselves to intrude on that two-way dialogue — but that was just the way the world was and we had to deal with it as best we could without losing sight of the main purpose of what we were about.
ReplyDeleteAs things have turned out in today’s inverted world, corporations and corporate owned politicians have totally perverted the natural student-teacher relationship beyond all hope of recognition.
And it has to stop.
Or the nation will really be at risk …
kudos
Delete